-
INDUSTRY PAPERS16 Min Read
Abstract
In this paper, a novel asymmetric trench SiC MOSFET with a Poly-Si/SiC heterojunction diode (HJD-ATMOS) is designed to improve its reverse conduction characteristics and switching performance. This structure features an integrated heterojunction diode, which improves body diode characteristics without affecting device static characteristics.
The heterojunction diode acts as a freewheeling diode during reverse conduction, reducing the cut-in voltage (Vcut-in) to a lower level than conventional asymmetric trench SiC MOSFET (C-ATMOS), while maintaining a similar breakdown voltage. Meanwhile, the split gate structure reduces gate-to-drain charge (Qgd). Through TCAD simulation, the HJD-ATMOS decreases Vcut-in by 53.04% compared to the C-ATMOS. Both Qgd and switching loss are reduced, with a decrease of 31.91% in Qgd and 40.29% in switching loss.
1. Introduction
The wide bandgap semiconductor properties of silicon carbide (SiC) make it a promising candidate for the development of future power switching devices. This is primarily due to SiC possessing properties such as a strong breakdown field, high physical and chemical stability, high thermal conductivity, and high electron saturation velocity.
SiC devices can operate in harsh environments due to their wide band gap of 3.25 eV and high thermal conductivity of 5 W/(cm·K). The SiC MOSFET is the most significant SiC power switching device due to its lack of trail current. This reduces switching loss and radiator volume, improving system power density.
SiC MOSFETs commonly make use of parasitic body-PN diodes as freewheeling diodes (FWD) in power inverter and converter systems. However, parasitic body-PN diodes in SiC MOSFETs are not ideal for use as freewheeling diodes. The reasons for this are as follows: Stacking faults (SFs) in SiC devices may cause reliability issues and increase conduction loss.
Although recent papers concerning the measured degradation of SiC MOSFETs show a high level of current threshold (about 5× the nominal current or more than 1000 A/cm2) for the starting of bipolar degradation, bipolar degradation effects can still occur in SiC MOSFETs under large cyclic pulse current densities. This will limit the application of SiC MOSFET devices in key areas, such as the surge current that flows through a diode during the start-up of a power converter, which can be more than ten times its rated current.
Furthermore, the body diode’s Vcut-in voltage (~2.7 V) is much higher than that of its silicon counterparts due to SiC’s wide bandgap. To overcome the drawbacks of parasitic body-PN diodes, numerous approaches have been devised to deactivate them. One approach is to integrate SiC MOSFETs with Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs). However, the use of external diodes not only introduces parasitic inductance, limiting switching frequency, but also consumes additional area in the package. And Schottky contacts suffer from a significant increase in reverse leakage current at high temperatures.
Furthermore, SiC MOSFETs with low-barrier and heterojunction diodes are available. Heterojunction diodes formed between polysilicon and SiC are attractive. Shenoy and Baliga, and Yamagami et al. presented studies on heterojunction diodes using P-Poly-Si and n-6H-SiC, and Poly-Si and 4H-SiC, respectively.
Both studies demonstrated low-forward-voltage Schottky-like characteristics. Ni et al. proposed a trench SiC MOSFET integrating polysilicon/SiC HJD, exhibiting excellent freewheeling diode (FWD) performance in both the first and third quadrants. The HJD’s unipolar behavior, similar to that of a Schottky diode, effectively suppresses the turn-on of the problematic body diode, mitigating the aging degradation observed in conventional SiC MOSFETs.
Additionally, HJDs reduce reverse recovery voltage and losses, enhancing long-term operational reliability. Furthermore, HJD integration eliminates the need for a separate SBD, leading to a smaller chip area, simpler packaging, and reduced overall system cost. This also minimizes parasitic inductance arising from additional components.
A novel asymmetric trench SiC MOSFET with a heterojunction diode at the right of the gate trench is proposed and simulated in this paper. The structure includes a trench gate with split-gate electrodes and a thicker P-Poly-Si layer, resulting in reduced gate charge and improved switching performance. To suppress the depletion layer, an n-type doped current spreading layer (N-CSL) is formed under the entire P-well region.
To maintain the breakdown voltage (BV) of the device structure while maintaining transfer and output characteristics similar to those of C-ATMOS, the depth of the P-well on the right side is not changed. The N-channel (Nch) is positioned below the P-Poly-Si and in contact with the CSL. The integrated HJD structure of the proposed device eliminates the requirement for an anti-parallel SiC SBD during reverse conduction. The HJD turns on at a low source–drain voltage (Vsd), thus eliminating bipolar degradation by inactivating the body diode. The split gate results in a decrease in gate charge, leading to a reduction in switching losses in the HJD-ATMOS without affecting other characteristics.
2. Device Structure and Mechanism
The schematic cross section of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS is shown in Figure 1. Similar to C-ATMOS, the device forms an inversion layer channel in the first quadrant to facilitate electron conduction. The N-CSL layer on the N-drift region reduces the on-resistance. Deep P-wells are used to reduce the electric field stress in the gate oxide at the trench bottom and corner.
The primary distinction is the body diode structure. The Nch region under the P-Poly-Si provides a low-barrier path for electrons. Meanwhile, the HJD-ATMOS has a split gate and HJD structure on the right of the gate oxide layer. The split gate structure uses only a portion of the trench space for the gate electrode, while the other part is thicker P-Poly-Si that forms a portion of the HJD structure. The HJD-TMOS facilitates low-voltage conduction by allowing electrons to cross the lower heterojunction barrier in the third quadrant. The structure of Nch and N-channel doping concentration (Nnch) will be further discussed based on this optimization in this paper. Device specifications are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1. Schematic cross section of (a) HJD-ATMOS and (b) C-ATMOS.
Table 1. Main parameters used in the simulation.
Sentaurus TCAD simulations are used to analyze the performances of the HJD-ATMOS and the C-ATMOS, considering doping and temperature-dependent Shockley–Read–Hall and Auger recombination, doping-dependent transport, impact ionization, band narrowing, high-field velocity saturation, and mobility degradation, as well as fixed charges at the SiC/SiO2 interface for closer simulation results to experimental data.
The energy band diagram of the P-Poly-Si/N-SiC heterojunction at thermal equilibrium is shown in Figure 2b. The energy band diagram at thermal equilibrium along the A-A’ cut-line is shown in Figure 2a. The heterojunction has a conduction energy gap of 0.46 eV and a valence barrier energy gap of 1.78 eV. The electron barrier height ΦBN is determined by the Fermi level energy Ef and the conduction band peak energy Ec, which is about 1.39 eV.
Figure 2c shows the simulated carrier density at the heterojunction interface under forward bias at the rated voltage. Electrons are injected from N-SiC to P-poly, but there are few holes from P-poly to N-SiC due to the high hole barrier. Therefore, the HJD exhibits unipolar action, similar to the SBD.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic cross section of HJD-ATMOS; (b) energy band diagram at thermal equilibrium along the A-A’ cut-line; (c) carrier density of the HJD when forward biased at rated voltage.
We also constructed a 3D band diagram of the device to better observe the working state of the device. Figure 3a shows the 3-D conduction band energy distribution of the device at Vds = 10 V and Vgs = 15 V. The band energy of Nch is higher than that of N-CSL, which prevents electron current from flowing to P-poly and enables the device to work normally like C-ATMOS.
Figure 3b shows the distribution of the devices when Vds = −5 V and Vgs = −5 V. The band energy of Nch is lower than that of N-CSL, resulting in electron current flowing from N-CSL to P-poly and preventing the turn-on of parasitic body-PN diodes.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional conduction band energy distribution between P-poly, gate, Nch, N-CSL, and P-well (a) when conduction is forward and (b) when conduction is reverse.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of the total current density, hole current density, and electron current density of the device. From the total current density distribution, it can be seen that the current does not flow from P-Poly-Si to P-well. But a high current density is also noted at the gate corner of P-Poly-Si, which should be noted in use. From the hole current density distribution, it can be seen that holes do not enter N-drift.
This is due to the difference in the band gap between SiC and polysilicon. Since the energy barrier height between the SiC and polysilicon junctions in the valence band is very large, in the HJD-ATMOS, electron current can move toward the source while hole current cannot move toward the drain. The device can operate normally at electron current densities of 10 A/cm2 and 500 A/cm2.
Figure 4. (a) Total current density distribution, (b) hole current density distribution, and (c) electron current density distribution at low and high current in the reverse conduction.
Figure 5 shows the I–V curves of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS in forward and reverse conduction at room temperature. The steeper slope of the I–V curve of HJD-ATMOS in the first quadrant indicates that its specific on-resistance (Ron,sp) is lower than that of C-ATMOS. This is because the presence of Nch in HJD-ATMOS results in a smaller depletion region of P-well on N-CSL, leading to a wider current conduction region.
According to the calculations, at Vgs = 15 V and Ids = 200 A/cm2, the Ron,sp values for HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS are 1.35 mΩ∙cm2 and 1.46 mΩ∙cm2, respectively. In the third quadrant, at Ids= −10 A/cm2, HJD-TMOS exhibits a significantly lower Vcut-in of only 1.39 V compared to the PN diode of C-TMOS. As a result, HJD-ATMOS is capable of reducing switching losses.
The rated operating current of the device in the third quadrant is generally Ids = −200 A/cm2. This means that the proposed HJD-ATMOS has a clear advantage over C-ATMOS in that it can start working at a lower voltage. The hole density distribution diagram in Figure 5 for Ids = −200 A/cm2 shows that the integrated HJD effectively suppresses minority carrier injection, reducing bipolar degradation.
Figure 5. First and third quadrant characteristics of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS.
In Figure 6, the local magnification shows that the HJD-ATMOS is affected by current spikes due to leakage. The figure demonstrates the change in breakdown voltage as a function of h and w when Nnch is, respectively, 2 × 1017 cm−3 and 2.5 × 1017 cm−3. It can be observed that when Nnch is 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, with h at 0.25 μm and w at 0.5 μm, the spike in the current is large, indicating the occurrence of leakage. When Nnch is 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, increasing h to 0.30 μm and w to 0.4 μm also results in leakage.
However, when Nnch is 2.0 × 1017 cm−3 and h increases to 0.3 μm, the device does not exhibit leakage, demonstrating that variations in Nnch have a significant impact on device performance. As shown in Figure 7, Vcut-in varies significantly with h. The minimum point of Vcut-in is 1.31 V at Nnch = 2 × 1017 cm−3, which is lower compared to its value of 1.71 V at Nnch = 2.5 × 1017 cm−3 and h = 0.2 μm.
This point represents the critical condition for the device not exhibiting leakage when Nnch = 2.5 × 1017 cm−3. After h is greater than 0.25 μm, the variation in Vcut-in with h tends to be flat, and if the value of h is larger, the protective effect of P-well on the gate oxide will also be weakened, and it will also increase the difficulty of process manufacturing.
As can be seen from Figure 8, when the device Vds is 0 V, Nnch is 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, and h is 0.25 μm, the HJD-ATMOS has more leakage than the device with Nnch is 2.0 × 1017 cm−3 and h is 0.30 μm. The darker regions in the current density plot for the HJD-ATMOS with Nnch at 2.5 × 1017 cm−3 and h at 0.25 μm are larger than those with Nnch at 2.0 × 1017 cm−3 and h at 0.30 μm, indicating higher leakage currents. This also confirms the hypothesis that the breakdown voltage spike is caused by heterojunction leakage. So the results indicate that Nnch = 2 × 1017 cm−3, h = 0.3 μm, and w = 0.5 μm are the optimal values.
Figure 6. The breakdown voltage varies with h, w, and Nnch, when Nnch is 2.0 × 1017 cm−3 and 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, h is 0.20 μm, 0.25 μm and 0.30 μm, and w is 0.1 μm to 0.5 μm, respectively.
Figure 7. Vcut-in varies with h, w, and Nnch, when Nnch is (a) 2.0 × 1017 cm−3, and (b) 2.5 × 1017 cm−3.
Figure 8. Current density distribution when (a) Nnch is 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, h is 0.25 μm, and (b) Nnch is 2.0 × 1017 cm−3, h is 0.30 μm at Vds = 0 V.
3. Simulation Results and Discussion
Figure 9 shows the capacitances of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS. Gate voltage was fixed at 0 V, a 1 MHz AC signal was applied, and drain voltage was swept from 0 to 1000 V. HJD-ATMOS has lower gate-to-source capacitance (Cgs) than C-ATMOS due to the smaller contact area with the source caused by the split gate structure. HJD-ATMOS’s gate-to-drain capacitance (Cgd) does not decrease.
This is because the P-well blocks the right side of the gate of C-ATMOS, performing a similar function as the split gate. Therefore, it can be observed that the Ciss (Cgs + Cgd) of the HJD-ATMOS with split gates is also smaller than that of the C-ATMOS.
Figure 9. The device capacitance of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS.
Gate-to-drain charge (Qgd) is critical for power device switching speed in device applications. Figure 10 shows a test circuit to simulate HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS gate charges during turn-on. The miller plateau height of HJD-ATMOS is less than that of C-ATMOS, indicating that the threshold voltage of HJD-ATMOS is smaller than that of C-ATMOS.
Because the gate charge is proportional to the gate capacitance, the HJD-ATMOS has a lower gate charge (Qg) and Qgd compared with the C-ATMOS. The Miller platform in HJD-ATMOS is shorter because of the reduced gate area. The Qgd values for HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS are 32 nC/cm2 and 47 nC/cm2, respectively. Qgd of HJD-ATMOS decreased by 31.91% compared to C-ATMOS. Reduced Qgd leads to a smaller high-frequency figure of merit in HJD-ATMOS.
Figure 10. The gate charge characteristics of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS.
Figure 11 shows the electric field distribution at the breakdown of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS. The electric field at the gate oxide of HJD-ATMOS is smaller than that of C-ATMOS. This is because the presence of the Nch introduces a portion of the electric field into this region, which alleviates the electric field that the gate oxide withstands.
Although increasing the electric field at the heterojunction raises leakage current risk, it is a trade-off for improved reverse conduction performance. Figure 12 shows the blocking characteristics of the HJD-ATMOS and the C-ATMOS at room temperature and high temperature. At room temperature, the data are represented by solid lines, whereas at elevated temperatures, they are depicted by dashed lines. HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS have similar breakdown voltages at room temperature. But the leakage current of the HJD-ATMOS increases at high temperature due to the increased thermal energy of the charge carriers.
The generation of leakage currents, as demonstrated and discussed in Figure 6 and Figure 8, arises due to leakage occurring at the heterojunction, where higher Nnch and greater values of thickness h both contribute to this effect. By improving the semiconductor material growth process, reducing defects and traps, and enhancing the material quality and interface integrity, it is possible to mitigate non-ideal scattering and trap effects experienced by charge carriers at the heterojunction interface, thus suppressing the leakage current.
While the HJD-ATMOS structure does indeed experience leakage under temperature influence, this leakage is within acceptable limits, with the level of leakage current being 1 × 10−5 μA/cm2.
Figure 11. Electric field distribution for the HJD-ATMOS and the C-ATMOS at BV.
Figure 12. Blocking characteristics of the HJD-ATMOS and the C-ATMOS.
Figure 13 shows a double pulse test circuit for investigating switching characteristics. This is a common circuit configuration employed in device testing. Stray inductance is 10 nH, and load inductance is 80 μH. The gate voltage source (Vg) is turned on from −5 V to 15 V at t = 16 µs and turned off from 15 V to 0 V at t = 11 µs.
Figure 14 shows the switching waveforms of devices. The switching speed of the HJD-ATMOS is faster than that of the C-ATMOS with an external SBD diode, which results in a smaller switching loss. Figure 15 compares the switching losses between the two devices. In HJD-ATMOS, the turn-on loss (Eon) is 0.26 mJ/cm2, and the turn-off loss (Eoff) is 0.41 mJ/cm2, which demonstrate a reduction of 62.32% and 4.65%, respectively, compared to C-ATMOS.
The total switch loss of HJD-ATMOS is reduced by 40.29% compared to C-ATMOS. This is due to the smaller Qgd compared with the C-ATMOS. Reduced switching losses in power electronic devices are instrumental in improving operational longevity and reliability. As losses during switching are directly proportional to heat generation, a significant decrease in these losses curtails thermal build-up, mitigating the risk of device overheating and extending its operational life.
This reduction also sustains lower junction temperatures, crucial for preventing material degradation in high-power-density applications where maintaining low operating temperatures is vital for ensuring long-term stability and reliability. Furthermore, minimizing switching losses allows power converters and similar equipment to function efficiently at elevated frequencies without sacrificing efficiency, empowering designers to develop compact, lightweight systems while consistently meeting reliability standards.
Figure 13. A circuit for simulating switching with a double pulsed test.
Figure 14. The switching characteristics of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS, including the (a) turn-on process and (b) turn-off process.
Figure 15. Switching loss comparison of IJ-ATMOS and C-ATMOS.
The majority of the process steps for HJD-ATMOS, including epitaxial growth, N+ source and P-well implantation, trench etching, P-base implantation, isolation oxidation, gate oxidation, polysilicon gate deposition, and metallization, are fully compatible with the manufacturing processes of C-ATMOS.
The N-channel region is formed by ion implantation at the bottom of the trench after trench etching. The split gate is formed by etching after trench oxidation, resulting in a thin layer of oxide between the gate and the P-Poly-Si. The gate-P-Poly-Si trench isolation layer is formed by thermal oxidation, and the trench oxide layer is fully etched and filled with P-Poly-Si.
Table 2 compares the HJD-ATMOS and the C-ATMOS in terms of their main characteristics. Dynamic FOM indicates the value of Ron,sp × Qgd. The HJD-ATMOS performs better due to the integrated HJD structure.
Table 2. Device characteristics comparison.
4. Conclusions
This paper proposes a novel asymmetric trench SiC MOSFET with a heterojunction diode. The performance of HJD-ATMOS and C-ATMOS is compared in detail. It can be observed that HJD-ATMOS demonstrates superior third-quadrant performance with a lower Vcut-in because of the integrated HJD. Compared with C-ATMOS, the Qgd of HJD-ATMOS has decreased by 31.91%. This is because the split gate design further reduces the total gate charge, which reduces the switching loss of the HJD-ATMOS device without affecting other key characteristics.
As a result, HJD-ATMOS eliminates bipolar degradation and reduces the turn-on loss from 0.69 mJ/cm2 in C-ATMOS to 0.26 mJ/cm2. With its advantageous features, HJD-ATMOS is a strong contender for power electronic applications.
Authors
Yiren Yu, Zijun Cheng, Yi Hu, Ruiyi Lv, Shengdong Hu.
Original – MDPI
-
Ideal Power Inc. announced that it has priced its previously announced underwritten public offering of 2,000,000 shares of its common stock (or pre-funded warrants in lieu thereof) at an offering price of $7.50 per share of common stock. Ideal Power has granted the underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to 300,000 additional shares of its common stock on the same terms and conditions. The Company expects to close the offering on March 28, 2024, subject to customary conditions.
Titan Partners Group, a division of American Capital Partners, is acting as sole book-running manager for the offering.
The gross proceeds to the Company from the offering are expected to be approximately $15 million, before deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate and working capital purposes.
The offering is being made pursuant to an effective “shelf” registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-269060) previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 29, 2022, and declared effective by the SEC on January 9, 2023.
The securities may be offered only by means of a prospectus and prospectus supplement that form a part of the registration statement. A preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus relating to and describing the terms of the offering have been filed with the SEC. The final terms of the offering will be disclosed in a final prospectus supplement to be filed with the SEC.
Electronic copies of the final prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus relating to the offering, when available, may be obtained by visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by contacting Titan Partners Group, LLC, a division of American Capital Partners, LLC, 4 World Trade Center, 29th Floor, New York, New York 10007, by phone at (929) 833-1246 or by email at prospectus@titanpartnersgrp.com.
Original – Ideal Power
-
LATEST NEWS5 Min Read
Decarbonization and digitalization are the two central challenges of our time, but they rely on new and advanced technologies. At embedded world 2024 in Nuremberg, Infineon Technologies AG will demonstrate how its innovative semiconductor solutions support and drive these advancements.
Microcontrollers in particular play an important role as they are at the heart of a wide range of applications, from electric vehicles and renewable energy systems to smart homes and industrial automation. For this reason, Infineon showcases high-quality microcontrollers designed with the latest technologies and innovative features such as enhanced security and high accuracy, offering excellent performance with low power consumption.
Under the motto “Driving decarbonization and digitalization. Together.” Infineon invites its customers to embedded world 2024 to demonstrate innovative semiconductor solutions that contribute to a more sustainable future. In addition, customers can register for Infineon’s digital platform – the perfect place to dive deeper into the various technologies presented at EW during and after the event. The Infineon booth in Hall 4A (booth #138) will present highlights from the consumer and IoT, automotive, and industrial sectors.
Consumer and IoT: With its broad portfolio of IoT solutions, Infineon supports manufacturers in providing consumers with more comfortable, secure, and energy-efficient homes and buildings by utilizing the company’s latest microcontroller, sensor, security, and connectivity solutions. In this area, visitors will discover:
- Robotics development platform: The platform includes hardware and software solutions for key robotics subsystems such as main and motor controllers, battery management systems and sensors, which enable developers to get robots up and running faster and easier.
- Better sleep quality with XENSIV™: Leveraging Infineon’s 60 GHz radar, PSoC™ and Wi-Fi® technologies, the XENSIV Sleep Quality Service is designed to measure and optimize the user’s sleep based on their individual needs.
- Simplifying air quality monitoring and optimizing energy efficiency with the new XENSIV PAS CO2 5V kits: The XENSIV PAS CO2 5V Sensor2Go kit provides developers with seamless CO 2 sensor integration and a plug-and-play solution. The effortless connection to the graphical user interface (GUI) allows users to accurately analyze CO 2 data in real time from multiple kits.
- Land a rocket on the Edge: This fun game demonstrates the PSoC Edge device’s ability to integrate multiple functions such as high-performance computing, graphics processing and display, acoustic activity recognition, speech recognition, sensing and gesture recognition with ML in the same chip and application.
Automotive: As a leading supplier of automotive solutions, Infineon focuses on making smart cars a reality with proven microcontroller, connectivity, security, and sensor technologies for the industry. The company’s microelectronics play a critical role in delivering zero-emission vehicles that are smart, connected, safe and reliable.
- AI-based siren recognition: Infineon showcases an autonomous car that recognizes emergency vehicles by their characteristic siren sound and reacts accordingly without violating traffic regulations. This system solution combines MEMS microphones, a microcontroller unit (MCU), and AI software from Imagimob.
- Next generation eMobility: Infineon enables next-generation vehicles with the AURIX™ TC4x microcontroller family and the AURIX Development Studio (ADS). With these solutions, manufacturers can easily implement modern ADAS, advanced automotive E/E architectures and affordable Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications.
- TRAVEO™ T2G Cluster 6M Lite Kit: With the TRAVEO T2G CYT4DL device prototypes can be implemented in the shortest possible time and at minimal cost.
Industrial: Infineon supports smart factories and provides manufacturers with a broad sensor portfolio and an extensive partner network. In this way, the company enables reliable data acquisition and processing that enables condition monitoring and predictive maintenance in various Industry 4.0 use cases:
- Predictive maintenance: In this sector, Infineon will present a portable HVAC system equipped with the XENSIV Predictive Maintenance Evaluation Kit. The demo includes a TinyML model and a cloud-based AI service solution generator.
At the Infineon booth, the company has set up a comprehensive series of TechTalks. The seven presentations will cover a wide range of different topics, from software to products, and from consumers to industry. Full details of all Infineon conference presentations, technical workshops and TechTalks can be found here.
Daily program of the Tech Talks
- “Ambient sensing: Infineon radar solutions: How Infineon’s tools and enablement can accelerate your time to market” at 10:00 a.m. presented by Firas Labidi
- “Embedded AI and safety – Embedded AI will enable the innovations for next generation of electric vehicle and autonomous driving” at 11:00 a.m. presented by Jürgen Schäfer
- “Accelerate your product development with system reference designs” at 12:00 p.m. presented by Jaya Bindra
- “Addressing the next generation of Edge AI devices with PSoC Edge” at 1:00 p.m. presented by Rebecca Phillips
- “TRAVEO T2G MCUs for automotive HD front lighting” at 2:00 p.m. presented by Maniacherry Devassy Anu
- “Unlocking the power of Edge AI with Imagimob and ModusToolbox™” at 3:00 p.m. presented by Alexander Samuelsson
- “Infineon’s solutions for robotics” at 4:00 p.m. presented by Nenad Belancic
Original – Infineon Technologies
-
LATEST NEWS1 Min Read
The Specialty Thin Film (STF) division of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. announced that its Electro-Films (EFI) factory in Warwick, Rhode Island, has been certified to the IATF 16949:2016 quality standard for the IGBR family of back contact wirebondable gate resistors, designed to reduce noise in silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFET power modules.
Based on ISO 9001:2015 — with additional automotive customer-specific requirements — IATF 16949:2016 is the global technical specification and quality management standard for the automotive industry. With this certification, the quality management system at the EFI Warwick factory is now certified to ISO 9001:2015 for all products, and IATF 16949:2016 for IGBR resistors. In addition, its environmental management system is certified to ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018.
Original – Vishay Intertechnology
-
LATEST NEWS / SiC / WBG2 Min Read
In the paper “Milliseconds Power Cycling (PCmsec) Driving Bipolar Degradation in Silicon Carbide Power Devices”, Sibasish Laha from Fraunhofer IISB and his co-authors Jürgen Leib, Andreas Schletz, Martin Maerz, Christian Liguda, Firas Faisal and Davood Momeni describe an innovative approach to silicon carbide (SiC) power cycling.
Until now, bipolar degradation (BD) tests have not been sufficiently differentiated in the investigation of failure and fault mechanisms for SiC power devices. SiC power products may experience voltage degradation which stems from the stacking faults (SFs) growth, commonly known as BD. To properly evaluate the BD impact on the electric performance of devices, it is important to distinguish it from other stress-related degradation such as power metal or interconnection.
This aspect has not yet been addressed, although the BD mechanism is well understood. The paper outlines a methodology by modifying the power cycling test (PCsec) to PCmsec in order to systematically investigate the effect of BD while controlling the impact of thermal degradation. This method enables a thorough evaluation of the distinct influences of both degradation contributors.
The complete paper will soon be available in the CIPS proceedings. Until then, feel free to download the paper presentation on event page.
There you can also find all our contributions to CIPS 2024:- Modified Approach for the Rainflow Counting Analysis of Temperature Load Signals in Power Electronics Modules – Oral presentation by S. Letz; Co-authors: D. Zhao, J. Leib, B. Eckardt, M. März
- Milliseconds Power Cycling (PCmsec) Driving Bipolar Degradation in Silicon Carbide Power Devices – Oral presentation by S. Laha; Co-authors: D. Momeni, J. Leib, A. Schletz, M. März, C. Liguda, F. Faisal
- Challenges of Junction Temperature Calibration of SiC MOSFETs for Power Cycling – a Dynamic Approach – Poster by J. Breuer, F. Dresel, A. Schletz, J. Klier, J. Leib, M. März, B. Eckardt
- Wide Bandwidth PCB Rogowski Coil Current Sensor with Droop Suppression and DC Restoration for In-Situ Inverter Measurements – Poster by S. Quergfelder, J. Sax, T. Heckel, B. Eckardt, M. März
Original – Fraunhofer IISB
-
LATEST NEWS4 Min Read
Aehr Test Systems announced preliminary financial results for its third quarter of fiscal 2024 ended February 29, 2024. Preliminary results reflect delays in wafer level burn-in system orders for semiconductor devices used in electric vehicles that have created a short-term gap in revenue and profitability. Additionally, Aehr provided updated revenue guidance for its full fiscal year ending May 31, 2024.
For the fiscal third quarter ended February 29, 2024, Aehr expects:
- Revenue of approximately $7.6 million
- GAAP net loss of approximately $1.5 million to $1.8 million, or $0.05 to $0.06 per diluted share
- Non-GAAP net loss of approximately $0.9 million to $1.2 million, or $0.03 to $0.04 per diluted share, which excludes the impact of stock-based compensation
- Bookings of $24.5 million
- Backlog as of February 29, 2024, of $20 million
For the fiscal 2024 full year ending May 31, 2024, Aehr expects:
- Total revenue of at least $65 million
- GAAP net income of approximately $11 million or more, or $0.38 per diluted share
- Non-GAAP net income of approximately $14 million or more, or $0.48 per diluted share, which excludes the impact of stock-based compensation
An explanation of the use of non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of Aehr’s non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures will be included when Aehr releases its full financial results for the fiscal 2024 third quarter on April 9, 2024.
Aehr Test Systems President and CEO Gayn Erickson commented: “As we discussed in our second quarter earnings call, we had seen several push outs of forecasted orders by current and new customers that impacted our fiscal year revenue. We believe that this was due to two key factors. There is clearly softness in the overall semiconductor capital spending, particularly in automotive applications, related to a glut in inventory driving down near-term orders to these companies and has caused them to push out capital spending and drive cost reductions. Multiple companies including the companies we had expected orders from have publicly discussed inventory related headwinds in their public earnings calls and press releases. In addition, we have seen specific shifts in order timing of our equipment used for wafer level test and burn-in of silicon carbide power semiconductors used in electric vehicles. In just the last two weeks of the quarter, we saw delays in orders for silicon carbide systems with customer-requested ship dates within the quarter as well as a last-minute push out by a customer of a system in our backlog. The net effect of this was a significant shift in revenues out of the third and fourth quarters. Until this time, we had been hearing from those customers that their silicon carbide-based capital investments were not being impacted.
“It is now clear that the recent overall softness in semiconductors and the impact of shifts in electric vehicle introductions and ramps are impacting our bookings and revenue forecasts more than we understood only two months ago at our last earnings call. We now expect this to last for another quarter or two before the orders resume based on the latest roll up of direct forecasts from over a dozen silicon carbide companies. We are now forecasting revenue for the full fiscal year to be $65 million or more, representing revenue of at least $15.4 million in our fiscal fourth quarter. We still expect to finish the year with near or above record annual revenue for the year.
“Our discussions with customers indicate to us that the key markets Aehr is addressing for semiconductor wafer level test and burn-in have significant long-term growth opportunities that will continue to expand throughout this decade. Despite what we believe are temporary delays in current and new customer orders, we believe Aehr will experience significant order, revenue, and earnings growth from these market opportunities. Our unique, proprietary wafer level test and burn-in offering for semiconductors addresses the need for the critical reliability testing and screening of semiconductors used in the worldwide electrification infrastructure, battery and hybrid electric vehicles, data and telecommunications and data storage, machine learning and Artificial Intelligence processors and communications chips, and in the large and growing semiconductor memory market. We look forward to discussing the impact and timing of these markets and the increase in customer engagements in all these markets on our earnings call planned for April 9th.”
The foregoing preliminary financial information reflects management’s current views with respect to the Company’s financial results. These preliminary results remain subject to the completion of normal quarter-end accounting procedures and closing adjustments. Aehr plans to release its full financial results for the fiscal 2024 third quarter on April 9, 2024, and will provide the time and conference call details in a later press release. No independent registered public accounting firm has reviewed, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to, nor have they expressed any form of assurance on, these preliminary estimated results.
Original – Aehr Test Systems